<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Beerdrinker.org is a beer drinker - Latest Comments in spiffy new road tax idea</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://beerdrinker.disqus.com/spiffy_new_road_tax_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:33:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: spiffy new road tax idea</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/03/spiffy-new-road-tax-idea/#comment-2579651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">free online poker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: spiffy new road tax idea</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/03/spiffy-new-road-tax-idea/#comment-2579650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'A cucumber is bitter.' Throw it away. 'There are briars in the road.' Turn aside from them. This is enough. Do not add, 'And why were such things made in the world?'&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texas holdem poker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: spiffy new road tax idea</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/03/spiffy-new-road-tax-idea/#comment-2579648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely agree.  While I'm not going to assert that SUVs do not have a time or place, I think that their times and places are far fewer than evidenced by our cronies.  There isn't a lot of need for the super-huge vehicles (the ones coinciding with that nice new tax credit), like Suburbans, Hummers, Excursions, Navigators, etc.  Maybe if you live in the mountains with a large family...?  One of those smaller, more efficient vehicles like the RAV-4 is totally suitable for 95% of SUV demands.  And let's see some reasonable demands on fuel-efficiency.  But that still doesn't cover emissions, safety, and cost of materials.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: spiffy new road tax idea</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/03/spiffy-new-road-tax-idea/#comment-2579649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just want to say that I am so tired of SUVs on the road &lt;br&gt;and the number of "all-terrain" vehicles that are&lt;br&gt;purchased in America each year. If we could&lt;br&gt; just start by reducing the amount of SUVs in our &lt;br&gt;country, we'd probably notice a difference in our air &lt;br&gt;quality! In my opinion, they are one of the worst gas hogs, even&lt;br&gt;more that full size pickup.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nedra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:31:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>