<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Beerdrinker.org is a beer drinker - Latest Comments in conservative characteristics</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://beerdrinker.disqus.com/conservative_characteristics/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:29:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: conservative characteristics</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/07/24/conservative-characteristics/#comment-2579779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Beer Is Good, &lt;br&gt;                            I need a writer who likes to talk about booze. Are you interested? Please reply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    Mitch&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: conservative characteristics</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/07/24/conservative-characteristics/#comment-2579778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting in the way that Comical Ali's press conferences were interesting.  It's such a value-laden exercise that the end result doesn't define conservatives so much as it does liberals; the study's authors, by their choice of conservative thought to analyze, are saying, "These are the values we disagree with, and we hereby define them as 'conservative.'"  Such BS.  But yeah, interesting to get a peek into an impressive effort in self-justification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On another topic, given your domain name, I assume you'll be at the Brewfest this weekend?  Personally I can't wait.  I did notice that Hair of the Dog is not there this year; I wonder why.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: conservative characteristics</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/07/24/conservative-characteristics/#comment-2579777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;just seeing if you're still out there ;)  It's mostly just fun that such an article is out there.  While I don't agree with the strength of your argument, it wasn't one that I found convincing so much as interesting.  It does feel like a retrofit job though, doesn't it? Still...it's a good read, a different way of looking at the 'problem', and strikes me as having a bit of truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 02:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: conservative characteristics</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/07/24/conservative-characteristics/#comment-2579776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't be serious.  Berkeley doing research on conservatives is like the KKK doing research on rap music.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>