<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Beerdrinker.org is a beer drinker - Latest Comments in CDs artificially too expensive?</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://beerdrinker.disqus.com/cds_artificially_too_expensive/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:52:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CDs artificially too expensive?</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/16/cds-artificially-too-expensive/#comment-2579668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;probably 7$ for lawyer fees.  postage, handling, etc, will probably come out of the 13 (estimated) to make it like $3.  btw, IANAL, and offer no substantive opinion on the subject, just my usual stuff, so if you recording industry jerks want retributrion, don't turn here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:52:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CDs artificially too expensive?</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/06/16/cds-artificially-too-expensive/#comment-2579667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I submitted the paperwork for a refund and I thought it was 20 bucks??!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Annie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>