<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Beerdrinker.org is a beer drinker - Latest Comments in Back</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://beerdrinker.disqus.com/back/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 12:38:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Back</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/05/15/back/#comment-2579624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thx ;)  my jet-lagged, soccer concussed mumbling was whether or not it's a bad thing to artificially set the timestamp for the post to the time it actually happened rather than when it was blogged...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 12:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back</title><link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/05/15/back/#comment-2579623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't even know what the question means.  But welcome back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 11:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>